Monday, February 23, 2009

BARACK OBAMA

(CNN) -- Barack Obama was sworn in as the 44th president of the United States and the nation's first African-American president Tuesday. This is a transcript of his prepared speech.

My fellow citizens:

I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.

Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often, the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because We the People have remained faithful to the ideals of our forebearers, and true to our founding documents.

So it has been. So it must be with this generation of Americans.

That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age. Homes have been lost; jobs shed; businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly; our schools fail too many; and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet. Video Watch the full inauguration speech »

These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable but no less profound is a sapping of confidence across our land -- a nagging fear that America's decline is inevitable, and that the next generation must lower its sights.


Today I say to you that the challenges we face are real. They are serious and they are many. They will not be met easily or in a short span of time. But know this, America: They will be met.

On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord.

On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.

We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.

In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of shortcuts or settling for less. It has not been the path for the fainthearted -- for those who prefer leisure over work, or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things some celebrated, but more often men and women obscure in their labor -- who have carried us up the long, rugged path toward prosperity and freedom.

For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across oceans in search of a new life.

For us, they toiled in sweatshops and settled the West; endured the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

The Dimka's Coup Attempt of February 13, 1976

The Dimka's Coup Attempt of February 13, 1976

Just before 8:30 a.m. on February 13, 1976, the following curious announcement was heard on Radio Nigeria:
"Good morning fellow Nigerians,
This is Lt. Col. B. Dimka of the Nigerian Army calling.
I bring you good tidings. Murtala Muhammed's deficiency has been detected. His government is now overthrown by the young revolutionaries. All the 19 military governors have no powers over the states they now govern. The states affairs will be run by military brigade commanders until further notice.
All commissioners are sacked, except for the armed forces and police commissioners who will be redeployed.
All senior military officers should remain calm in their respective spots. No divisional commanders will issue orders or instructions until further notice.
Any attempt to foil these plans from any quarters will be met with death.
You are warned, it is all over the 19 states.
Any acts of looting or raids will be death.
Everyone should be calm.
Please stay by your radio for further announcements.
All borders, air and sea ports are closed until further notice.
Curfew is imposed from 6am to 6pm.
Thank you. We are all together."
Just prior to this broadcast, then Head of State, General Murtala Ramat Muhammed, along with his ADC (Lt. Akinsehinwa), Orderly and driver, had been assassinated on his way to work in a thin skinned black Mercedes Benz car without escorts. The unprotected car had slowed down at the junction in front of the Federal Secretariat in Ikoyi, Lagos, when a hit team which allegedly included Lt. William Seri and others, casually strolled up and riddled it with bullets.
Following confirmation of Muhammed's death, Lt. Col. Buka Suka Dimka, of the Army Physical Training Corps, who (along with some others) had been up for most of the night drinking champagne, then made a quick trip to the British High Commission at about 8 am where he demanded to be put in touch with General Gowon in Britain. He allegedly left a message through Sir Martin LeQuesne, saying Gowon should proceed to Togo and await further instructions.
Then he returned, initially accompanied by six others, to Ikoyi to seize the Radio Station. The martial music played was allegedly specially selected by a civilian worker, Mr. Abdulkarim Zakari, who had been alerted beforehand to do so.
Other hit teams simultaneously went after other key functionaries of the regime's trioka, namely the Chief of Staff, SHQ, Lt. Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo and the Army Chief, Lt. Gen. T. Y. Danjuma. The Military Governors of Kwara and Oyo States, Colonels Ibrahim Taiwo and David Jemibewon, respectively, were also targeted. Taiwo, who had been the national coordinator of the July 1975 coup that brought Mohammed to power, was abducted and killed by a team led by Major K. K. Gagara.
Jemibewon, whose name had been added to the list of targets by Lt. Col T. K. Adamu, merely because Adamu "did not like his face", escaped.
In response to a pro-coup broadcast (and other activities) from Benin-City by the Brigade Commander, Colonel Isa Bukar, counter-broadcasts dissociating other army units from the coup were made, first from Calabar by the Brigade Commander, Colonel Mamman J. Vatsa, and then from Kaduna on behalf of the GOC, Brigadier Alani Akinrinade.
As efforts were being made within the military to crush the revolt, University students in Lagos and Ibadan (among others) took to the streets to protest the coup. Later, when it became known that Dimka had visited the British High Commission on the day of the coup, some students attacked British and American facilities in Lagos.
The coup attempt eventually failed seven hours later, crushed by forces rallied and directed from a temporary base at Bonny camp by Lt. General T. Y. Danjuma, Chief of Army Staff, whose designated assassin (reportedly Lt. Lawrence Garba) had chosen at the last moment to spare him at the Marina Jetty, allegedly in part to avoid collateral casualties. When Danjuma got to the office and heard the radio broadcast, he held a brief "war council" with Colonels Bali and Babangida, then moved to Bonny camp to coordinate the resistance. Babangida was sent on a motor cycle to Ikeja Cantonment to get armoured vehicles. Supported by these vehicles he proceeded to Radio Nigeria, where he had a conversation with his close friend Dimka.
Dimka's initial reaction to Babangida's arrival was to ask him if he came to play "Chukwuma and Nwawo" with him; drawing a historical parallel with the negotiations between Colonel Conrad Nwawo (on behalf of Ironsi) and Major Patrick Nzeogwu in Kaduna in January 1966. However, Dimka got concerned with the presence of armored vehicles in the background and asked them to be withdrawn.
But it turns out that Babangida's orders had not been to negotiate a surrender or other outcome, but to stop the broadcast - by any means necessary - including destruction by shelling. When he made contact with Bonny Camp to report his activities at the radio station, this order was reiterated to him by General Danjuma, incredulous that a conversation with Dimka had even occurred and that the radio station was still playing Dimka's broadcast. A brief but fierce fire fight (reportedly led by Major Chris Ugokwe) subsequently dislodged the coup plotters from the station.
When shooting started Dimka simply walked away, past all the soldiers surrounding the building as well as driving through numerous checkpoints on his way, first to Jos and then eventually to Abakaliki where he was captured by Police in the company of a woman of easy virtue. At that time, public incredulity at his "escape" from Radio Nigeria led to speculations that he was assisted. But many years later, in April 1990, a similar 'escape' from a siege of supposedly loyal troops was executed by Lt. Col. Gabriel Nyiam and Major Saliba Mukoro.
General Olusegun Obasanjo (rtd) has written that he was late in leaving home that day on account of a visit by Brigadier Olu Bajowa to get a name for his new baby. When it became apparent that there was trouble, Obasanjo executed an escape and evasion maneuver, spent most of the day at the house of a civilian friend in Ikoyi monitoring the situation by telephone, but later emerged to become the Head of State. His would be assassins mistook then Colonel Dumuje for him along Awolowo road in Lagos, seriously wounding that officer. The specifics of how that happened remain a matter of conjecture particularly since the car of a Lt. General would have had three stars mounted on the license plate. Whether Dumuje was riding in Obasanjo's car is a curious possibility that has never been clarified. Or perhaps the hit men were drunk and could not tell one flag from another.
Subsequent evidence, allegedly based on documents and tapes discovered at the station, suggests that Dimka had actually planned a second broadcast which he never got to make. The broadcast would have gone like this:
"Fellow Nigerians,
This is Lt. Col. BS Dimka. I now explain why we the Young Revolutionaries of the Armed Forces have found it necessary to overthrow the six month old government of Murtala. On the 29th July 1975 the Government of General Gowon was overthrown. Some of the reasons given for the change were:
a. Corruption
b. Indecision
c. Arrest and detention without trial
d. Weakness on the part of the Head of State
e. Maladministration in general and a host of other malpractice.
Every honest Nigerian will agree with me that since the change over of government there has not been any physical development in the whole country generally.
All we have is arbitrary dismissal of innocent Nigerians who have contributed in no less amount to the building of this great nation. A Professor was arrested, detained, dismissed and later taken to court on an article which every honest Nigerian will agree that all the points contained in that article were 100% truth. The sad point about it all is that those who initiated the retirement or dismissal exercise are the worst offenders. You will be informed about the ill-gotten wealth in my next announcement.
The acting General Manager of the Nigerian Airways was invited to the Dodan Barracks and detained without trial. The people of this country have been living in a state of fear. The Armed Forces promotion exercise is still fresh in your minds. Whatever reasons they have for the promotion one can only say that they are ambitious. They in fact took over power to enrich themselves.
We are convinced that some of the programmes announced for a return to civilian rule are made to favor a particular group. To mention only one. Maitama Sule is a politician. But has been appointed Chief of Commissioners for Complaints. This is to prepare him for the next political head at all cost. How many of you know that Maitama Sule is on a salary of N17,000 p.a.?
In view of what I have just said and a lot more which time will not permit me to mention, we the Young Revolutionaries have once again taken over the Government to save Murtala from total disgrace and prevent him from committing further blunders and totally collapsing the country before he runs away in the name of retirement to enjoy the huge fortune he got through bribe which he has now stored outside this country. I believe that charity should begin at home.
Please stay by your radio for further announcements.
We are all together."
The Obasanjo regime, however, later issued a public statement proffering its own explanation for the Dimka coup attempt. The four reasons given by the government were that :
1. The plotters felt the Murtala government was abandoning Nigeria's traditional non-aligned posture and going "communist".
2. The plotters were opposed to recent Army promotions and the appointment of Danjuma as Army Chief.
3. The plotters intended to restore General Gowon to office
4. The plotters intended to restore all previous military governors to office, as well as restore all retired public servants back to office. Any subsequent retirement was to be based on legal due process. (As of that time about 11,000 civil servants and over 200 army officers had been summarily retired across the country)
Seven days of national mourning were declared and flags flew at half mast.
Following up on the opinion of the Obasanjo regime at the time, that General Gowon "knew and by implication, approved" of the plot (based on Dimka's testimony regarding a brief encounter during a trip he had earlier made to London), a formal request for him to be extradited from Britain was made on March 24, 1976.
General Gowon himself strongly denied the charge. The British government rejected the extradition request and made it plain through back-channels that if the Nigerian government insisted too strongly on getting Gowon back, Nigerian leaders should be prepared to deal with British coldness if (as individuals) they one day found themselves in exile. Publicly, diplomatic relations with Britain, however, took a nose dive and Gowon, without trial, was dismissed as an officer (albeit retired) in the Nigerian Armed Forces. (He was later reinstated by President Shagari).
As expected, mass arrests were made after the coup failed, not just of active duty and retired soldiers, but also civilians. Major C.D. Dabang, an inner circle officer who had pleaded with Dimka to delay the coup until he was well enough to take part, was still undergoing treatment at the Military Hospital in Lagos when soldiers arrived, disconnected his drip and took him away. Many important figures of the Gowon era were arrested and quizzed. There is at least one, known to this author, who is very lucky to be alive today.
At least two Boards of Inquiry sat (including those chaired by Brigadiers Obada and Eromobor). Death sentences passed by a separate Special Military Tribunal were confirmed by the Supreme Military Council. However, it remains unclear to this day to what extent certain individuals who were shot were actually involved in the Dimka coup. Among others, Col A.D.S. Wya is frequently mentioned.
The first batch of executions was announced by Brigadier Shehu Yar'Adua, who had just been double promoted from the rank of Lt. Col. He went on television (Channel 10) to say "They are being shot about now". This was followed the next morning by a gleeful headline in the Daily Times that read: "Thirty-Two shot in Round One". Another batch, including Dimka himself, was to follow later.
However, two NCOs, Sergeant Clement Yildar and Corporal Dauda Usman escaped and were never found.
They were declared wanted. To this day, they have not (to my knowledge) surfaced.
Those executed included:
1. Major General I.D. Bisalla (Defence Commissioner)
2. Joseph Gomwalk (Ex-Governor of Benue-Plateau)
3. Col. A.D.S. Wya
4. Col Isa Bukar
5. Lt. Col. T.K. Adamu
6. Lt. Col A.B. Umoru
7. Lt. Col B.S. Dimka
8. Lt. Col. Ayuba Tense
9. Major C.D. Dabang
10. Major Ola Ogunmekan
11. Major J.W. Kasai
12. Major J.K. Afolabi
13. Major M.M. Mshelia
14. Major I.B. Rabo
15. Major K.K. Gagara
16. Capt. M.R. Gotip
17. Capt. M. Parvwang
18. Capt. J.F. Idi
19. Capt. A.A. Aliyu
20. Capt. S. Wakian
21. Capt. Austin Dawurang
22. Lt. A.R. Aliyu
23. Lt. William Seril
24. Lt. Mohammed
25. Lt. E.L.K. Shelleng
26. Lt. O. Zagmi
27. Lt. S. Wayah
28. Lt. S. Kwale
29. Lt. Peter Cigari
30. Lt. Lawrence Garba
31. Seven (7) non-commissioned officers
32. Mr. Abdulakarim Zakari (civilian broadcaster)
Others were retired or dismissed or imprisoned.
General Gowon's relatives in the armed forces were hounded out or jailed. But in 1981 a former member of the SMC, Lt. Gen Alani Akinrinade (rtd) openly admitted in an interview with the Punch newspaper that there wasn't a strong case against General Gowon.
SOME SHORT AND LONG TERM CONSEQUENCES
Although the new Obasanjo led team that came to office (against Obasanjo's "personal wish and desire") pledged to continue along the footsteps of Muhammed, the so-called Dimka coup had lasting military and non-military, judicial, domestic and foreign policy effects.
It was the first time since the executions of Banjo, Ifeajuna, Alale and Agbam on September 25, 1967 in Enugu, by Ojukwu, that anyone was being executed for that alleged offence within Nigeria's colonial borders. It led to the promulgation - by the Obasanjo regime - of certain retrospective decrees which made 'concealment of treason' an offence punishable with a life sentence and created new "Special Military Tribunal" laws justifying mass executions for coup participation which have remained with us until the recent initiative in the Legislature. Indeed, when General Obasanjo (rtd) was tried in 1995 on suspicion of concealment of treason by the Abacha regime, it was the law he signed into effect just under 20 years before, which was pulled off the shelf and used to charge him. It later emerged that the charge was frivolous and he was lucky to survive the Abacha gulag. However, it did not escape notice that others charged under that decree in the past may not have been so lucky. Indeed notions of Treason and Treasonable felony in Nigerian Military Tribunal Law and their consistency with the governing laws of Nigeria still need to be revisited. And the complex intrigues of the coup investigative process also need to be addressed. There are people who were officially cleared of all charges relating to the Dimka coup in 1976 who still barely escaped getting shot "on contract" at Kiri-Kiri prison.
The Dimka coup was a national security embarrassment. Efforts by then Inspector General of Police, MD Yusuf, to resign were rebuffed. But the coup led directly to the creation of the National Security Organization (NSO), whose first Director, then Brigadier Abdulai Mohammed was recalled from his post as a Governor. However, the existence (since 1976) of the NSO and its by-product, the SSS, has not stopped coups in Nigeria, as events since then have demonstrated.
Except for the use of Peugeot cars, the so called "low profile" policy of the Muhammed regime was largely jettisoned. Key figures became better protected by accompanying troops. The Brigade of Guards was disbanded and new troops rotated in.
The leadership style of the regime changed.
Muhammed's hard charging, occasionally impulsive style was replaced by a steadier and level headed but still dictatorial approach. Then Brigadier Shehu Yar'Adua's new role in the Trioka as Chief of Staff, SHQ, launched him into his subsequent national political career when he left office. Other relationships forged in the trials and tribulations of the painful events surrounding the Dimka coup were to last for many years after - such as that between President Olusegun Obasanjo, his Defence Minister, Lt. Gen. TY Danjuma (rtd) and his Chief of Staff, Major General Abdulai Mohammed (rtd).
Although already known for toughness from his July 1966 and civil war days, General Danjuma's stature as "the man in charge of the Army" was reinforced by his bold leadership during the coup. Indeed, he could quite easily have taken over the country if he wanted - assuming meanings would not have been read into it by geopolitical pundits.
Then Colonel Ibrahim Babangida became a pop hero for supposedly flushing Dimka out of Radio Nigeria, although the exact nature of his 'negotiation' with Dimka at NBC was never clarified. He was to emerge again on the national scene in 1983 and 1985. It was not until an interview in the Guardian with Lt. Col G.
Nyiam in April 2000, that the unsung role of Col.
Chris Ugokwe (rtd) at the radio station that day in 1976 became public knowledge.
The diplomatic effects, particularly on Anglo-Nigerian relations, have been discussed. Both countries recalled their ambassadors and it was not until 1979 that the resident Nigerian High Commissioner in London was replaced.
Domestically, the coup crystallized political tensions between the Moslem far north and the Christian middle belt which were not altogether new, but have persisted in one form or another. As can be recognized, most of those executed were of Plateau State origin. But the curious notion of a 'Plateau group' in the Army never did die. It resurrected many years later as the "Langtang Mafia".
Lastly, it made the late General Murtala Muhammed a hero. According to General James Oluleye who was then Finance Commissioner, quite apart from a state burial, naming monuments after him and fulfilling obligations for his pension and gratuity as a Four Star General, the government infused a large amount of cash directly into his estate to protect his family from future financial embarrassment.

Edmund Burke

When I see the spirit of liberty in action, I see a strong principle at work; and this, for a while, is all I can possibly know of it. The wild gas, the fixed air is plainly broke loose: but we ought to suspend our judgments until the first effervescence is a little subsided, till the liquor is cleared, and until we see something deeper than the agitation of the troubled and frothy surface. I must be tolerably sure, before venture publicly to congratulate men on a blessing, that they have really received one. Flattery corrupts both the receiver and the giver; and adulation is not of more service to the people than to kings. I should therefore suspend my congratulations on the new liberty of France, until I was informed how it had been combined with government; with public force; with the discipline and obedience of armies; with the collection of an effective and well-distributed revenue; with the solidity for property; with peace in order; with civil and social manners. All these (in their way) are good things to; and, without them, liberty is not a benefit while it lasts, and is not likely to continue long. The effect of liberty to individuals is, that they may do what they please: we ought to see what it will please them to do, before we risk congratulations, which may soon be turned into complaints. Prudence would dictate this in the case of separate insulated private men; but liberty, when men act in bodies, is power. Considerate people, before they declare themselves, will observe the use which is made of power; and particularly of so trying a thing as new power in new persons, of whose principals, tempers, and dispositions, they have little or no experience, and in situations where those who appear the most stirring in the scene may possibly not be the real movers. . . .
The age of chivalry is gone. -- That of sophisters, economists, and calculators, has succeeded; and the glory of Europe is extinguished forever. Never, never more, shall we behold a generous loyalty to rank and sex, that proud submission, that dignified obedience, that subordination of the heart, which kept alive, even in servitude itself, the spirit of an exalted freedom. The unsought grace of life, achieved defensive nations, the nurse of the manly sentiment and heroic enterprise is gone! It is gone, that sensibility of principle, that chastity of honor, which felt a stain like a wound, which inspired courage while it mitigated ferocity, which ennobled whatever it touched, and under which vice itself lost half its evil, by losing all its grossness. . . .
But now all is to be changed. All the pleasing illusions, which made power gentle, and obedience liberal, which harmonized the different shades of life, and which, by a bland the simulation, incorporated into politics the sentiments which beautify and soften private society, are to be dissolved by this new conquering empire of light and reason. All the decent drapery of life is to be rudely torn off. All the super-added ideas, furnished from the wardrobe of a moral imagination, which the heart owns, and the understanding ratifies, as necessary to cover the defects of her naked shivering nature, and to raise it to dignity in our own estimation, are to be exploded as ridiculous, absurd, and antiquated fashion.
On this scheme of things, a king is but a man; a queen is but a woman; a woman is but an animal; and an animal not of the highest order. . . . On the scheme of this barbarous philosophy, which is the offspring of cold hearts and muddy understandings, and which is as void of solid wisdom, as it is destitute of all taste and elegance, laws are to be supported only by their terrors, and by the concern, which each individual may find in them, from his own private speculations, or even spare to them from his own private interests. In the groves of their academy, at the end of every vista, you see nothing but the gallows. . . . When the old feudal and chivalrous spirit of Fealty, which, by freeing kings from fear, freed both kings and subjects from the precautions of tyranny, shall be extinct in the minds of men, plots and assassinations will be anticipated by preventive murder and preventive confiscation, and that long roll of grim and bloody maxims, which form the political code of all power, not standing on its own honor, and the honor of those who are to obey it. Kings will be tyrants from policy when subjects are rebels from principle. . . .To make a government requires no great prudence. Settle the seat of power; teach obedience: and the work is done. To give Freedom is still more easy. It is not necessary to guide; and only requires to let go the rein. But to form a free government; that is, to temper together these opposite elements of liberty and restraints in one consistent work, requires much thought, deep reflection, a sagacious, powerful, and combining mind. This identifying to those who take the lead in the National Assembly. Perhaps they are not so miserably deficient as they appear. I rather believe it. It would put them below the common level of human understanding. But when the leaders choose to make themselves bidders at an auction of popularity, their talents, and the construction of the state, will be of no service. They will become flatterers instead of legislators; the instruments, not the guides, of the people. If any of them should happen to propose a scheme of liberty, soberly limited, and defined with proper qualifications, he will be immediately outbid by his competitors, who will produce something more splendidly popular. Suspicions will be raised of his fidelity to his cause. Moderation will be stigmatized as the virtue of cowards; and compromise as the prudence of traders; until, in hopes of preserving the credit which may enable him to temper, and moderate, on some occasions, the popular leader is obliged to become active in propagating doctrines, and establishing powers, that will afterwards defeat any sober purpose at which he ultimately might have aimed.
The improvements of the National Assembly are superficial, their errors are fundamental.
[Source: Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France, in The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, vol. 2 (London: Henry G. Bohn, 1864), pp. 515-516. There is also a hypertext version of Burke's Reflections.]

Friday, August 15, 2008

BAKASSI PENINSULA HANDOVER (AUG 14 2008)

World news before it happensForesight and insightfor professionals who bank on the future
SUBSCRIBE to the World News Forecast to see one year+ ahead. Future world news headlines and the stories behind them. Foreign news calendar, planner, daybook and diary.
Home
NIGERIA 14 August 2008 Objecting Nigeria due to hand over Bakassi Peninsula. War on horizon?
Nigeria is due to hand over the disputed oil-rich Bakassi Peninsula to Cameroon in line with a World Court ruling and withdraw from the territory on Aug 14, but the deal is under fire. Former Nigerian president Olusegun Obasanjo signed the so-called Green Tree Agreement with Cameroon President Paul Biya, but the Nigerian parliament hasn't ratified it. There are predictions the dispute will lead to war.
As reported in the Nigerian publication Leadership, the Chief of Defence Staff for Nigeria, General Owoye Azazi, complained that Obasanjo did not consult the military before making the deal, and he predicted a war over the peninsula. The military chief also said ceding Bakassi to Cameroon was not in the interest of Nigeria's security as the area would take over the deep marine routes, leaving Nigeria with shallow waters which cannot be navigated.
There is an ongoing insurgency in the adjoining Niger Delta that threatens to spread to the Bakassi Peninsula -- with or without a Cameroon takeover. Ethnic minorities of the region are said to be unhappy that the ethnic majorities in the Nigerian and Cameroon governments are deciding their fate in a way that is not in the region's interests. The Bakassi inhabitants are also said to fear forced relocation if the deal is realized.
France could be drawn into the war, should it break out, as it has a defence treaty with Cameroon. Jul/08
RELATED READING:
Nigeria: War imminent over Bakassi (Leadership/AllAfrica 17 Jul 2008)http://allafrica.com/stories/200807170436.html
Nigeria gunmen attack Cameroon patrol on border (Reuters 22 Jul 2008)http://africa.reuters.com/wire/news/usnL22834120.html
Tension over Bakassi Penninsula (ISN 21 Jul 2008)http://by102w.bay102.mail.live.com/mail/mail.aspx?&n=1484376789

Bakassi Peninsula handover
Nigeria is due to hand over the disputed oil-rich Bakassi Peninsula to Cameroon in line with a World Court ruling and withdraw from the territory on Aug 14, but the deal is under fire. Former Nigerian president Olusegun Obasanjo signed the so-called Green Tree Agreement with Cameroon President Paul Biya, but the Nigerian parliament hasn't ratified it. There are predictions the dispute will lead to war.
Bakassi Peninsula handover
Bakassi Peninsula handover, Bakassi Peninsula transfer, Nigeria, Cameroon, World Court ruling, Green Tree Agreement, President Paul Biya, Olusegun Obasanjo , Cameroon President Paul Biya, former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo , Nigeria news, Africa news, African news, Cameroon news
Authored by Affiliate Links RSS Newsroom

Cameroon set for Bakassi peninsula handover from Nigeria

Cameroon set for Bakassi peninsula handover from Nigeria
AFPPublished: Wednesday, August 13, 2008
AKWA, Cameroon - Nigeria was set to complete the handover of the Bakassi peninsula to Cameroon on Thursday, ending a 15-year dispute over a territory believed to contain considerable oil and gas reserves.
A flag-exchanging ceremony will complete the transfer of Bakassi, which juts into the oil-rich Gulf of Guinea.
The transfer which has been described by United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon as "a model for negotiated settlements of border disputes" will be "painful" for the regional powerhouse Nigeria, according to a presidential spokesman.
The handover, staggered over two years, has been dogged by political disagreements, a last-minute lawsuit and the odd gun battle.
A Cameroon government official said Thursday's finalization of the transfer marks "the end of a crisis" that began in December 1993 when the Nigerian army occupied a number of villages on the peninsula.
Cameroon first took its case to the International Court of Justice in the Hague (ICJ) in March 1994.
After a drawn-out legal battle, the ICJ ruled in October 2002 that the Bakassi peninsula should be given to Cameroon. It based its decision largely on a 1913 treaty between former colonial powers Britain and Germany.
Cameroon and Nigeria then signed an accord, known as the Green Tree agreement, in New York in June 2006 during US-facilitated mediation talks and in the presence of then UN secretary general Kofi Annan, paving the way for Nigeria's withdrawal from Bakassi.
But the handover has been threatened by last-minute legal challenges and a number of deadly attacks.
Last month, a federal court in Nigeria's capital Abuja granted an injunction preventing the government from handing over Bakassi to Cameroon by its agreed deadline.
Despite the move, President Umaru Yar'Adua insisted Nigeria would not abandon its international obligations.
"This handing over process, as painful as it is for everyone including the President, is a commitment we have made to the international community and we have a responsibility to keep it," Yar'Adua's spokesman Olusegun Adeniyi, told reporters Tuesday.
The handover ceremony, hailed by the UN office for West Africa (UNOWA) as a "landmark" in Nigeria-Cameroon ties, will take place in the nearby Nigerian city of Calabar.
But Nigerian newspapers on Wednesday said Nigeria had beefed up security on the swampy peninsula suggesting the handover will take place there.
Nigerian officials were not immediately able to clarify the venue.
Bakassi, which is believed to contain oil and gas reserves as well as rich fishing grounds, has in recent months been the scene of clashes between Cameroonian soldiers and local armed groups opposed to the transfer.
Some 50 people have been killed in the clashes.
© AFP 2008

Monday, July 21, 2008

The Cuban Crisis

Return to National Security Archive Homepage







The Cuban Missile Crisis, 1962
A National Security Archive Documents Reader
Edited by Laurence Chang and Peter Kornbluh
Read the Introduction
Ordering information for this book is available at the W.W. Norton & Co. website. Or by phone:
800-233-4830 (U.S.)
717-346-2029 (Outside U.S.)


Read original Washington Post coverage of the Cuban Missile Crisis as it unfolded 40 years ago this week



The Cuban government's La Crisis de Octubre: una visión política 40 años después. "The Crisis of October: A political vision 40 years later" (In Spanish)


FOREIGN RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES
1961-1963
Volume XI
Cuban Missile Crisis and Aftermath

Press releases, selected documents, photographs, audio clips and other material from the historic conference in Havana.




Formerly secret documents from U.S., Cuban, Soviet and East Bloc archives.


Listen in on White House intelligence briefings and hear the actual voices of President Kennedy, his brother Robert, and other advisers during meetings of the President's Executive Committee (ExComm).


Images of Soviet missile and antiaircraft installations taken by U-2 spyplanes and U.S. Navy low-level reconnaissance aircraft in October-November 1962 used to brief President Kennedy and his advisers.


Documents, naval charts and other declassified records on the U.S. hunt for Soviet submarines during the most dangerous days of the crisis.


Two day-by-day, minute-by-minute chronologies of events surrounding the missile crisis.


Read the analysis of contemporary historians as they sift through the historiography and more recent evidence to learn the lessons of history.

The Declassified History.
At midday, and again in the early evening of October 16, 1962, John F. Kennedy called together a group of his closest advisers at the White House. Late the night before, the CIA had produced detailed photo intelligence identifying Soviet nuclear missile installations under construction on the island of Cuba, some ninety miles off the Florida coast; now the president and his men confronted the dangerous decision of how the United States should respond . . . [More]


The Most Dangerous Moment.
If the Cuban Missile Crisis was the most dangerous passage of the Cold War, the most dangerous moment of the Cuban Missile Crisis was the evening of Saturday, 27 October 1962, when the resolution of the crisis—war or peace— appeared to hang in the balance . . . [More]


Annals of Blinksmanship.
Now that the Cold War is over, its history has become a growth industry, though in truth there was no great shortage of historical analysis even while the war was going on. Today, however, one finds a certain generational divide as perhaps the salient characteristic of the enterprise . . . [More]


Turning History on Its Head.
For nearly forty years most American accounts of the Cuban Missile Crisis of have left Cuba out of the story. With the blockbuster film "Thirteen Days" the story now ignores the Soviet Union as well. The film turns history on its head and drums into our heads exactly the wrong lessons of the crisis. . . [More]

Saturday, July 19, 2008

POLICY OF POLITICS

POLICY OF POLITICS

The word POLITICS is generic as it means many things to many people and at the same time a constant player in the scheme of things as it pertains to every sphere of life. The main course meal of POLITICS is the collectiveness in the decision made by individuals. In all fairness anyone who says they are not interested in politics is like a drowning man who insists he is not interested in water.This is a core issue that concerns all and sundry as it affects and governs the operation of goods and services.We must not loose sight of the overwhelming effect of POLITICS because of its major role.

Ironically, POLICY refers to prudence or wisdom in the management of affairs. Albeit, it must be noted of uttermost urgency in other for one to conquer in any field of endeavor one is required to understand the rules of the game in consonance with the flick “Rules of Engagement”. Life in retrospect is a game which demands strict adherence to its rules for there to be an overall effect both as individuals and collectively as a nation brand.

Developed nations have standard practices that are acceptable in the way they discharge their operations and responsibilities. Standardization is not a myth neither is it fiction but rather it is a set of guiding principles, objectives with great tendency in conforming us to an acceptable way or pattern of doing things. In every profession, there are norms which govern and over ride our conduct so as not to be mediocre rather excel in our various endeavors.

Politics I make bold to say is not for BOYS but for MEN. By this I mean it is the main stream for those who are ready to take their destiny in their hands with full knowledge of the consequence. In reference to developed economies like America , England , Russia , etc who painstakingly have weathered the storm in the actualization of the great nation we see today did this via the instrumentality of POLITICS.

Understanding the “Rules of Engagement” is critical at this point as it is the basis for any successful feat. As a means to an end, we must come to terms with the fact that if we must become the very best in our forte, we must imbibe the culture of discipline to STANDARDS i.e expectations that are far reaching which will establish manifestations in our set goals and objectives thereby giving us a stance in the global league.

Unarguably is the fact that life places on us demands with responsibility we must discharge uniequivocally. However the professions for the job vacancy one is vying or be it admission into an institution of learning, certain expectations are required which will act as a basis for inclusion. This is not far fetched from what we call POLITICS. A system of set rules and principles that guides and regulates the vision and pattern of an organization.

Scientific research and breakthrough is borne out of discoveries most of which is premised on formulaSTRATEGY. In the military, there is no battle that is fought without strategies as it is pivotal and tangential to victory. So it is in every game or sport whereby we have a stiff competition and it is expected that at the end a winner would emerge and be given a price.

Basically, if we must take our place as giant of Africa and be in the front burner of the community or league of developed nations we must be able to identify the way key players of the league faired as in what they did to get and remain there. In my quest for this reality, I stumbled into this light that I am expounding.

DISCIPLINE
In its most general sense, discipline refers to systematic instruction given to a disciple. This sense also preserves the origin of the word, which is Latin disciplina "instruction", from the root discere "to learn," and from which discipulus "disciple, pupil" also derives.Self-discipline refers to the training that one gives one's self to accomplish a certain task or to adopt a particular pattern of behaviour, even though one would really rather be doing something else. For example, denying oneself of an extravagant pleasure in order to accomplish a more demanding charitable deed. Thus, self-discipline is the assertion of willpower over more base desires, and is usually understood to be a synonym of 'self control'. Self-discipline is to some extent a substitute for motivation, when one uses reason to determine a best course of action that opposes one's desires.
As put by Carl Zuckmeyer, “Half of life is luck; the other half is discipline - and that’s the important half, for without discipline you wouldn’t know what to do with luck.”
Simply put, “ Discipline is the bridge between goals and accomplishments” by Jim Rohn.
This is a core value trait which anyone who has risen to the ovation as showcased and same must be replicated if we must have a nation that is of world class standard.

DECISION

This is centre to our life activities as it forms a major percentage of who we are and what we represent. It speaks of one’s stand and position on a matter. Like we have two sides to a coin so it is in this case as it unravels fundamentals of same which are Commitment and Responsibility.

Below are references of men who combined the two factors above and made head way in POLITICS.

ARISTOTLE

In his book[POLITICS],the greek philosopher(384-322BC) asserted that man is by nature a political animal.He argued that ethics and politics are closely linked,and that a truly ethical life can only be lived by someone who participates in politics.Profoundly put,he stated that kingship,with one ruler,devolves into tyranny;aristocracy,with a small group of rulers,devolves into oligarchy;and polity, with collective rule by many citizens, devolves into democracy.


THOMAS HOBBES

In 1651,he published his most famous work[LEVIATHAN] in which he proposed a model of early human development to justify the creation of polities,i.e governed bodies. He described an ideal state of nature wherein every person had equal right to every resource in nature and was free to use any means to acquire those resources.

CONFUCIUS

This Chinesse philosopher(551-471BC)was one of the first thinkers to adopt a distinct approach to politics.His philosophy was “rooted in the belief that a ruler should learn self-discipline,should govern his subjects by his own example,and should treat them with love and concern.”His beliefs are strongly hinged to personal ethics and morality,beliving that only a morally upright ruler who possessed virtue,should be able to exercise power,and that the behaviour of an individual ought to be consistent with their rank in society.

According to a Chinese Proverb, “A wise man makes his own decisions, an ignorant man follows public opinion” is unarguably a food for thought that should remain dare to our hearts with a keen interest in getting involved in decision making in the way we relate to our spouses,work,colleaguses,school-mates,friends and top most our nation.

Policy making is a strategy for harnessing ideas as put by Bill Moyers, ”Ideas are great arrows,but there has to be a bow. And politics is the bow of Idealism.” I make bold to say in this democratic dispensation, that what will keep the wheel of change in constant motion is a perpetual effort to grasp that decision making is a collective and individualistic TASK.

POLICY OF POLITICS

The word POLITICS is generic as it means many things to many people and at the same time a constant player in the scheme of things as it pertains to every sphere of life. The main course meal of POLITICS is the collectiveness in the decision made by individuals. In all fairness anyone who says they are not interested in politics is like a drowning man who insists he is not interested in water.This is a core issue that concerns all and sundry as it affects and governs the operation of goods and services.We must not loose sight of the overwhelming effect of POLITICS because of its major role.

Ironically, POLICY refers to prudence or wisdom in the management of affairs. Albeit, it must be noted of uttermost urgency in other for one to conquer in any field of endeavor one is required to understand the rules of the game in consonance with the flick “Rules of Engagement”. Life in retrospect is a game which demands strict adherence to its rules for there to be an overall effect both as individuals and collectively as a nation brand.

Developed nations have standard practices that are acceptable in the way they discharge their operations and responsibilities. Standardization is not a myth neither is it fiction but rather it is a set of guiding principles, objectives with great tendency in conforming us to an acceptable way or pattern of doing things. In every profession, there are norms which govern and over ride our conduct so as not to be mediocre rather excel in our various endeavors.

Politics I make bold to say is not for BOYS but for MEN. By this I mean it is the main stream for those who are ready to take their destiny in their hands with full knowledge of the consequence. In reference to developed economies like America , England , Russia , etc who painstakingly have weathered the storm in the actualization of the great nation we see today did this via the instrumentality of POLITICS.

Understanding the “Rules of Engagement” is critical at this point as it is the basis for any successful feat. As a means to an end, we must come to terms with the fact that if we must become the very best in our forte, we must imbibe the culture of discipline to STANDARDS i.e expectations that are far reaching which will establish manifestations in our set goals and objectives thereby giving us a stance in the global league.

Unarguably is the fact that life places on us demands with responsibility we must discharge uniequivocally. However the professions for the job vacancy one is vying or be it admission into an institution of learning, certain expectations are required which will act as a basis for inclusion. This is not far fetched from what we call POLITICS. A system of set rules and principles that guides and regulates the vision and pattern of an organization.

Scientific research and breakthrough is borne out of discoveries most of which is premised on formulaSTRATEGY. In the military, there is no battle that is fought without strategies as it is pivotal and tangential to victory. So it is in every game or sport whereby we have a stiff competition and it is expected that at the end a winner would emerge and be given a price.

Basically, if we must take our place as giant of Africa and be in the front burner of the community or league of developed nations we must be able to identify the way key players of the league faired as in what they did to get and remain there. In my quest for this reality, I stumbled into this light that I am expounding.

DISCIPLINE
In its most general sense, discipline refers to systematic instruction given to a disciple. This sense also preserves the origin of the word, which is Latin disciplina "instruction", from the root discere "to learn," and from which discipulus "disciple, pupil" also derives.Self-discipline refers to the training that one gives one's self to accomplish a certain task or to adopt a particular pattern of behaviour, even though one would really rather be doing something else. For example, denying oneself of an extravagant pleasure in order to accomplish a more demanding charitable deed. Thus, self-discipline is the assertion of willpower over more base desires, and is usually understood to be a synonym of 'self control'. Self-discipline is to some extent a substitute for motivation, when one uses reason to determine a best course of action that opposes one's desires.
As put by Carl Zuckmeyer, “Half of life is luck; the other half is discipline - and that’s the important half, for without discipline you wouldn’t know what to do with luck.”
Simply put, “ Discipline is the bridge between goals and accomplishments” by Jim Rohn.
This is a core value trait which anyone who has risen to the ovation as showcased and same must be replicated if we must have a nation that is of world class standard.

DECISION

This is centre to our life activities as it forms a major percentage of who we are and what we represent. It speaks of one’s stand and position on a matter. Like we have two sides to a coin so it is in this case as it unravels fundamentals of same which are Commitment and Responsibility.

Below are references of men who combined the two factors above and made head way in POLITICS.

ARISTOTLE

In his book[POLITICS],the greek philosopher(384-322BC) asserted that man is by nature a political animal.He argued that ethics and politics are closely linked,and that a truly ethical life can only be lived by someone who participates in politics.Profoundly put,he stated that kingship,with one ruler,devolves into tyranny;aristocracy,with a small group of rulers,devolves into oligarchy;and polity, with collective rule by many citizens, devolves into democracy.


THOMAS HOBBES

In 1651,he published his most famous work[LEVIATHAN] in which he proposed a model of early human development to justify the creation of polities,i.e governed bodies. He described an ideal state of nature wherein every person had equal right to every resource in nature and was free to use any means to acquire those resources.

CONFUCIUS

This Chinesse philosopher(551-471BC)was one of the first thinkers to adopt a distinct approach to politics.His philosophy was “rooted in the belief that a ruler should learn self-discipline,should govern his subjects by his own example,and should treat them with love and concern.”His beliefs are strongly hinged to personal ethics and morality,beliving that only a morally upright ruler who possessed virtue,should be able to exercise power,and that the behaviour of an individual ought to be consistent with their rank in society.

According to a Chinese Proverb, “A wise man makes his own decisions, an ignorant man follows public opinion” is unarguably a food for thought that should remain dare to our hearts with a keen interest in getting involved in decision making in the way we relate to our spouses,work,colleaguses,school-mates,friends and top most our nation.

Policy making is a strategy for harnessing ideas as put by Bill Moyers, ”Ideas are great arrows,but there has to be a bow. And politics is the bow of Idealism.” I make bold to say in this democratic dispensation, that what will keep the wheel of change in constant motion is a perpetual effort to grasp that decision making is a collective and individualistic TASK.

POLICY OF POLITICS

The word POLITICS is generic as it means many things to many people and at the same time a constant player in the scheme of things as it pertains to every sphere of life. The main course meal of POLITICS is the collectiveness in the decision made by individuals. In all fairness anyone who says they are not interested in politics is like a drowning man who insists he is not interested in water.This is a core issue that concerns all and sundry as it affects and governs the operation of goods and services.We must not loose sight of the overwhelming effect of POLITICS because of its major role.

Ironically, POLICY refers to prudence or wisdom in the management of affairs. Albeit, it must be noted of uttermost urgency in other for one to conquer in any field of endeavor one is required to understand the rules of the game in consonance with the flick “Rules of Engagement”. Life in retrospect is a game which demands strict adherence to its rules for there to be an overall effect both as individuals and collectively as a nation brand.

Developed nations have standard practices that are acceptable in the way they discharge their operations and responsibilities. Standardization is not a myth neither is it fiction but rather it is a set of guiding principles, objectives with great tendency in conforming us to an acceptable way or pattern of doing things. In every profession, there are norms which govern and over ride our conduct so as not to be mediocre rather excel in our various endeavors.

Politics I make bold to say is not for BOYS but for MEN. By this I mean it is the main stream for those who are ready to take their destiny in their hands with full knowledge of the consequence. In reference to developed economies like America , England , Russia , etc who painstakingly have weathered the storm in the actualization of the great nation we see today did this via the instrumentality of POLITICS.

Understanding the “Rules of Engagement” is critical at this point as it is the basis for any successful feat. As a means to an end, we must come to terms with the fact that if we must become the very best in our forte, we must imbibe the culture of discipline to STANDARDS i.e expectations that are far reaching which will establish manifestations in our set goals and objectives thereby giving us a stance in the global league.

Unarguably is the fact that life places on us demands with responsibility we must discharge uniequivocally. However the professions for the job vacancy one is vying or be it admission into an institution of learning, certain expectations are required which will act as a basis for inclusion. This is not far fetched from what we call POLITICS. A system of set rules and principles that guides and regulates the vision and pattern of an organization.

Scientific research and breakthrough is borne out of discoveries most of which is premised on formulaSTRATEGY. In the military, there is no battle that is fought without strategies as it is pivotal and tangential to victory. So it is in every game or sport whereby we have a stiff competition and it is expected that at the end a winner would emerge and be given a price.

Basically, if we must take our place as giant of Africa and be in the front burner of the community or league of developed nations we must be able to identify the way key players of the league faired as in what they did to get and remain there. In my quest for this reality, I stumbled into this light that I am expounding.

DISCIPLINE
In its most general sense, discipline refers to systematic instruction given to a disciple. This sense also preserves the origin of the word, which is Latin disciplina "instruction", from the root discere "to learn," and from which discipulus "disciple, pupil" also derives.Self-discipline refers to the training that one gives one's self to accomplish a certain task or to adopt a particular pattern of behaviour, even though one would really rather be doing something else. For example, denying oneself of an extravagant pleasure in order to accomplish a more demanding charitable deed. Thus, self-discipline is the assertion of willpower over more base desires, and is usually understood to be a synonym of 'self control'. Self-discipline is to some extent a substitute for motivation, when one uses reason to determine a best course of action that opposes one's desires.
As put by Carl Zuckmeyer, “Half of life is luck; the other half is discipline - and that’s the important half, for without discipline you wouldn’t know what to do with luck.”
Simply put, “ Discipline is the bridge between goals and accomplishments” by Jim Rohn.
This is a core value trait which anyone who has risen to the ovation as showcased and same must be replicated if we must have a nation that is of world class standard.

DECISION

This is centre to our life activities as it forms a major percentage of who we are and what we represent. It speaks of one’s stand and position on a matter. Like we have two sides to a coin so it is in this case as it unravels fundamentals of same which are Commitment and Responsibility.

Below are references of men who combined the two factors above and made head way in POLITICS.

ARISTOTLE

In his book[POLITICS],the greek philosopher(384-322BC) asserted that man is by nature a political animal.He argued that ethics and politics are closely linked,and that a truly ethical life can only be lived by someone who participates in politics.Profoundly put,he stated that kingship,with one ruler,devolves into tyranny;aristocracy,with a small group of rulers,devolves into oligarchy;and polity, with collective rule by many citizens, devolves into democracy.


THOMAS HOBBES

In 1651,he published his most famous work[LEVIATHAN] in which he proposed a model of early human development to justify the creation of polities,i.e governed bodies. He described an ideal state of nature wherein every person had equal right to every resource in nature and was free to use any means to acquire those resources.

CONFUCIUS

This Chinesse philosopher(551-471BC)was one of the first thinkers to adopt a distinct approach to politics.His philosophy was “rooted in the belief that a ruler should learn self-discipline,should govern his subjects by his own example,and should treat them with love and concern.”His beliefs are strongly hinged to personal ethics and morality,beliving that only a morally upright ruler who possessed virtue,should be able to exercise power,and that the behaviour of an individual ought to be consistent with their rank in society.

According to a Chinese Proverb, “A wise man makes his own decisions, an ignorant man follows public opinion” is unarguably a food for thought that should remain dare to our hearts with a keen interest in getting involved in decision making in the way we relate to our spouses,work,colleaguses,school-mates,friends and top most our nation.

Policy making is a strategy for harnessing ideas as put by Bill Moyers, ”Ideas are great arrows,but there has to be a bow. And politics is the bow of Idealism.” I make bold to say in this democratic dispensation, that what will keep the wheel of change in constant motion is a perpetual effort to grasp that decision making is a collective and individualistic TASK.


Need a job, visit www.jobsearchee.blogspot.com